Let me start by saying I think Galvatron is pretty nifty in both modes, I like the colors and love the transformation, mine doesn't come apart, and the backpack is kind of a mess so I reverse the treads to allow right arm rotation. The only thing I really don't care for (despite being too small for the character) is the simplistic face sculpt.
Dominic wrote:But, I am not buying toys for kids to enjoy and learn from them. I buy toys to enjoy them myself. (Yes, I am being selfish here. So sue me.) I appreciate parts that integrate into both modes gracefully. (I would agree about Ramulus here, but think other large parts can gracefully integrate.) If me getting a gracefully engineering toy with integrating parts deprives little Jimmy of a valuable life lesson, then I guess little Jimmy needs to get his learnin' done some other way.
Then your argument is bunk. You are careful, you are cautious, you can put things away and remember where they are later. I have SW accessories from 13 years ago in ziploc baggies that I still am entirely aware of their locations. The rifle with CD Scattorshot is fine and dandy, you haven't made a solid argument - it's a good loose accessory, and it pegs onto the figure in BOTH modes, and if you don't like it you can put it the hell away. Why should we accommodate your personal issues when they don't even hold up?
I was careful with my toys as a kid, that is why transforming my Ramjet to plane mode was such an ordeal. I had to carefully put the fists some place that I would not lose them. Ditto for parts like Soundwave's guns (or at least missiles) or Bluesteak's weapons. Yeah, Prime's trailer held some of this stuff. But, if I wanted to transform that........
Bags, toyboxes, shit like that.
Dominic wrote:I never thought of that. Has this happened to anyone we know?
-thinks Megatron is just askin' for it.
First off, you can edit your posts, no need to post twice, but 'ats ok.
Now, the answer is no, it's never happened to anybody. What is with you thinking there's a good reason to put your johnson into the try-me hole on the packaging of toys? Why are you trying to get Megatron to suck you off, is it that moving mouth on the figure?
Onslaught Six wrote:I've got mine right here. The only really obvious Flat Areas I see are all either vehicle kibble like his shoulders or legs, or his shoulders, which...yeah, are pretty much bare except for the rivet details and the line through the middle. But this is *okay* because 'that's what Onslaught looks like.' He's clearly homaging certain aspects of his design like the shoulders, the back of his legs, the back cannons, and his chestplate sorta which I'll get to in a sec.
Again, you're talking about an homage to the bad parts of the original, the plain nature of the bot mode. The shoulders, the sides around the front of the torso, the upper legs, and the "boots" are all pretty plain and flat. Oh, and the HEAD.
My argument is that both Onslaughts have a bunch of wheels and they stick out the back of his legs in both incarnations.
A lot of G1 Onslaught's wheels are on the back of his torso. Anyway, just having wheels on the legs isn't really that similar, could list off dozens of figures with that who aren't homages to Onslaught.
Awesome sentence.
Intentional internettery.
The rear of the truck on ClaPrime, or Prime's Design In General?
Classics Prime, with the toes sticking out the back and then those fold-over panels taking up much of what would be the rotation space.
And the body design bit is nonsense because G1 Prime is one of my favourite toy designs ever. I still draw Prime with bits missing from his forearms.
That doesn't mean it's better just because it's your favorite. It's still a box with legs and arms and a head.
Refuted earlier.
Not really.
I've yet to see you point out any specific areas where he's undetailed.
And now you have.