Re: Sam/shia le bouf,do you belove him or loate him?
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 11:43 am
Sam as a character is just too much at once, he's got too much going on simply because his grandpa had some glyphs on his glasses, that automatically means he has the natural skills to defeat both Megatron and Starscream, function as the Autobots' ambassador to Earth, handle being nabbed by super secret paramilitary forces, and survive a million other things that his character didn't have aptitude for, all with barely a scratch on him. He is the main character not by virtue of any ability or talent, but simply BECAUSE he is the main character, and he's only that because Spielberg is his pimp or something.
Wesley Crusher had natural born gifts, talents that helped him excel in his position. And he often failed only to have to learn from those mistakes or learn how to rely on his fellow shipmates to get past that. Wesley was a wunderkind not because Roddenberry was trying to pander to a youth audience, but because that's what Roddenberry's ideal of his own youth was. Granted, the writers on TNG really didn't know what to do with that and overused the character, constantly making him smarter and smarter to fit the needs of the script, but I'd take a thousand Wesleys over Sam any day.
Bottom line, Wesley Crusher is a gifted young person whose situation and talents drove his experiences; Sam Witwicky is only "gifted" in that the producers and writers of the movieverse make him the central character without anything to justify that.
As for performance, Shia LaBeouf plays his type of smarmy yet slightly charming character very well, but a little goes a long way, and he doesn't show any range beyond "smarmy yet slightly charming". I neither love him nor loathe him, but I side more towards the latter, I think he's woefully miscast and overused in Transformers, and it seems like his significant successes are largely a piece of Hollywood backroom shenanigans rather than actual ability, which I find more grating than his smarminess.
Wesley Crusher had natural born gifts, talents that helped him excel in his position. And he often failed only to have to learn from those mistakes or learn how to rely on his fellow shipmates to get past that. Wesley was a wunderkind not because Roddenberry was trying to pander to a youth audience, but because that's what Roddenberry's ideal of his own youth was. Granted, the writers on TNG really didn't know what to do with that and overused the character, constantly making him smarter and smarter to fit the needs of the script, but I'd take a thousand Wesleys over Sam any day.
Bottom line, Wesley Crusher is a gifted young person whose situation and talents drove his experiences; Sam Witwicky is only "gifted" in that the producers and writers of the movieverse make him the central character without anything to justify that.
As for performance, Shia LaBeouf plays his type of smarmy yet slightly charming character very well, but a little goes a long way, and he doesn't show any range beyond "smarmy yet slightly charming". I neither love him nor loathe him, but I side more towards the latter, I think he's woefully miscast and overused in Transformers, and it seems like his significant successes are largely a piece of Hollywood backroom shenanigans rather than actual ability, which I find more grating than his smarminess.