I admit to doing this. If a company misbehaves to a such a degree that they are insufferable, I will drop their books. DC is like the sneering Cambridge artist type. Most of their books work on multiple levels, and I am never quite sure when one of those books is intended to be a middle finger to the readers. (Johns is unusually direct in his complaints.)Ah, my bad. I've read a few comments from people saying "Such-and-such is irksome, done with the company", so just figured.
Bringing back Barry Allen effectively made everything DC publishes noise, if only by proving they have no ideas. Mind you, I am still reading "Captain Atom" (a back up in "Action Comics") for train-wreck value.
I am more likely to flip through a DC book, more likely to buy a Marvel book if I do pick it up, and more likely to come back and buy another DC book if I happen to buy one.
Dude, of course Loeb cannot tell the truth. Quesada will beat him if he does. Do you want Joe Quesada to beat Jeff Loeb? Do you?So yeah, it was his idea, not Quesada's. I'm not sure what he means by making "the Ultimate line like what it HAD been" though. Really what he gives as examples of what is "unexpected" about the Ultimate line shows more of his lack of understanding about the Ultimate Universe. The X-Men were never rock stars, just Dazzler who was a punk rocker before joining the X-Men rather than a disco diva in 616. And Peter being 16? That's how old he was when he got his powers in both versions.
Either way, it was a bad comic.
I think Loeb was saying that the "Ultimate" books had an established and expected status quo after 10 years. He wanted to get rid of that. My question is how many of the changes will stick.
Dom
-getting comics tonight.
