Re: More than Meets the Eye (IDW ongoing comic)
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 3:59 pm
I still have yet to see Scrapper, Thrust, Ramjet, Bumblebee or Shockwave come back. Some of those have been dead for a long time.
Welcoming all views from the Transformers community
https://tfviews.com/forums/
This."Replaced a dead character with a quantum duplicate" is just as much of a comic-book cop-out to undo a death and you know it.
I concede that Thundercracker objectively should have stayed dead, as should Sunstreaker. (I like what Costa did with Thundercracker. And, I tend to think he had some ideas for Sunstreaker that were never delivered on as Costa's run got was cut short.)remember Sunstreaker apparently dying back in Escalation...
I didn't say it wasn't a cop-out. My point was simply that this isn't the same Rewind come back to life, so he didn't "get better". The Rewind that died is still dead, and this is a duplicate who has had an entirely different experience since the Lost Light originally left Cybertron. It's a way to bring the character back to life without actually undoing his death.BWprowl wrote:To-may-to, to-mah-to. "Replaced a dead character with a quantum duplicate" is just as much of a comic-book cop-out to undo a death and you know it.
Considering the war never happened in the altered timeline we've seen with the Functionalists becoming ever more controlling of Cybertronian society without anyone to stop them, and the database entry Ultra Magnus has on Megatron was erased at the end of this issue, not to mention Brainstorm pointing a gun at the newborn Megatron... All signs would seem to suggest Megatron never existed in the altered timeline. But like I said: I expect another twist in the story.And assuming Brainstorm is even actually there to kill Megatron. Yeah, we see him pointing a 'gun' at Megatron in the last page, but with Roberts, a gun is only a plain ol' gun like half the time. Especially with *Brainstorm* involved, that thing could do literally anything, for all we know.
You could say the same thing for C and D listers in Marvel or DC. Doesn't change that death hasn't ever been depicted as a permanent thing in those comics. IDW's Transformers comics isn't any different with a revolving door for death.Dominic wrote:But, the C and D listers have largely stayed dead so far. The Technobots were probably not meant to come back. The dead seekers were dead (complete with visible remains in the case of Ramjet).
The guys from Garrus 9 ("Last Stand of the Wreckers") have stayed dead. (On the other hand, Maximus is arguably an exception to this.)
Ratbat is dead.
A few Lost Light crew have died.
There is a guy on page with the same name and look as the guy who died. And, he functionally is the same guy. That is stupid.The Rewind that died is still dead, and this is a duplicate who has had an entirely different experience since the Lost Light originally left Cybertron. It's a way to bring the character back to life without actually undoing his death.
Yes, it is a problem with Marvel and DC.You could say the same thing for C and D listers in Marvel or DC. Doesn't change that death hasn't ever been depicted as a permanent thing in those comics. IDW's Transformers comics isn't any different with a revolving door for death.
Obviously he's functionally the same guy, he's a duplicate. But, in that he is a duplicate that was created when the Lost Light left Cybertron, he's also not the same Rewind we've seen for pretty much this entire series. Think of situations like Will Riker and Thomas Riker, or Peter Parker and Ben Reilly. With both of those examples, they each started out as functionally the same guy, right? But yet, they are each their own individual. That's a pretty important distinction. The only difference here is that Rewind could assume his duplicates life because the Rewind from 'our' Lost Light died.Dominic wrote:There is a guy on page with the same name and look as the guy who died. And, he functionally is the same guy. That is stupid.
How has TF avoided it until fairly recently? TF has been killing off and bringing characters back to life ever since G1. Even if you narrow that down to just the IDW comics, it's hardly just recently that they've had characters come back from death.But, TF largely avoided that problem until fairly recently, making it unique. The less differentiation there is between TF and the Big Two the less reason there is to read it (especially when TF taking the habits of Marvel and DC is an obvious downgrade).
Here's a weird one: What's the precedence for the individual Insecticons having clones in IDW? I know there was the Swarm and all that shit, but is it possible, in theory, for there to be "another" Bombshell running around? Or that the dead one was just a "copy" of Bombshell? (We've all seen this excuse used to justify the Insecticons appearing after their deaths in TFTM, AND simultaneously an explanation for why there are so many Sweeps when Unicron only creates two.)Dominic wrote:This."Replaced a dead character with a quantum duplicate" is just as much of a comic-book cop-out to undo a death and you know it.
This is so fascinating to me, the way episodic mediums work, because growing up, I didn't really consume such things. Sure, there would be "episodic" cartoons or TV like Rugrats or something, but nobody dies in those, and episode air order often doesn't matter or is ignored by networks. Power Rangers existed, but it (again) doesn't really have strict precedent for characters "dying" or coming back. (Early Rangers would have a habit of popping back up again in later seasons, like Tommy returning as the White Ranger, but it was never explicitly stated that old Rangers couldn't gain new powers. I know, ass-pulling shit.) Beast Wars may have been the first show where characters died, and stayed dead (or didn't) that I ever watched. I didn't read comics on a close enough basis to know whether certain characters were "currently dead" or not, and "adult" drama TV shows like the X-Files were beyond my interest. Probably the closest analog I have? Pro wrestling.Suntreaker's death in "Escalation" was not really a death, as Furman always intended to bring Sunstreaker back as a head-master. Similarly, Costa had a plan Ironhide, so that "death" does not count.
I am so far functionally removed from this book that I don't know what the fuck this means. And it's not because I don't like the book or don't want to read it!(On the other hand, Maximus is arguably an exception to this.)
Was Maximus ever confirmed dead in Last Stand? I always assumed that he was just in "critical condition" the way Springer has been for the last 3-4 years. (When is he coming back, you think?)
To add a completely different point of discussion... Anyone notice the color of Megatron's spark? Roberts has confirmed Megatron to have a .1% spark, but the spark he had as Brainstorm was aiming at him appeared blue rather than green. And I'm betting that's intentional.
Aren't you the one telling everyone all over the place that these are literally the best TF comics ever? Shouldn't you...be reading them first?Onslaught Six wrote:I am so far functionally removed from this book that I don't know what the fuck this means. And it's not because I don't like the book or don't want to read it!
There was some wacky back-write to explain Bombshell showing up in "Spotlight:Blaster" and having that contradicted in "All Hail Megatron". But, I forget the details.Here's a weird one: What's the precedence for the individual Insecticons having clones in IDW? I know there was the Swarm and all that shit, but is it possible, in theory, for there to be "another" Bombshell running around? Or that the dead one was just a "copy" of Bombshell? (We've all seen this excuse used to justify the Insecticons appearing after their deaths in TFTM, AND simultaneously an explanation for why there are so many Sweeps when Unicron only creates two.)
Presentation and context matter.But how do we know that they aren't planning to bring back Superman in six months already from the start? We don't. So it's like, it's impossible to tell if this death is meant to be for him to come back anyway, or if he's going to come back as a consequence of real-life editorial or fan bullshit.
I know fans (commonly referred to as "smarks" with varying degrees of derision and affection) who can call matches, even angles. They know the business well enough, follow the press and can read trends. ("Boooooooo-tista"?)Maybe Daniel Bryan was always going to face (and possibly lose) to Roman Reigns at Fastlane to challenge Reigns' dominance as the new #1 contender for the WWE Title. Maybe that was the plan from day one. It's too easy for Bryan to just win the Rumble and go after Brock, he has to go after Reigns first, and in the process they could easily cement Reigns as being cool and dominant, even if it's not "his" year. And that's totally cool. But we'll probably NEVER know that it wasn't the plan from the very beginning, just like we might never know if Ramjet was killed just so they could bring him back.
Perhaps in trying to kill Megatron (if indeed that's what he's doing), Brainstorm instead mutates his spark and turns him into a .1% bot. I hope it's not yet another case of a major Decepticon becoming a tyrant because of some outside influence (like Shockwave) rather than because he made a series of choices that led him down a darker and darker road, but it wouldn't surprise me if we do see Megatron influenced by Brainstorm's actions in the past.Sparky Prime wrote:To add a completely different point of discussion... Anyone notice the color of Megatron's spark? Roberts has confirmed Megatron to have a .1% spark, but the spark he had as Brainstorm was aiming at him appeared blue rather than green. And I'm betting that's intentional.