TF Views

The thing is that the stories would likely be derivative at best. Give me stuff that sucks in new and exciting ways.


As far as blaming Loeb, we need to know exactly what Joey Q told him to write. He might have told Loeb to write to pole-reversal in, regardless how much sense it might make.

Heck, giben the temper Marvel's big man is reported to have, how clearly could ypu think or write on any given day.

Dominic wrote:Give me stuff that sucks in new and exciting ways.

I think you just inadvertantly summed up ROTF's toyline.

Shockwave wrote: and now having read the synopsis am glad I dropped all Marvel titles from my pull list.

I never get this mentality, myself. I mean, sure, do what makes you happy with your moneys, but to not buy something from a particular company that employs lots of different creators because a few of 'em did dreadfully wrong? Joe Q. may have approved this stuff and all, but he also approves comics that are great fun and high-quality. So, y'know, I'm sending a message with my moneys that they should keep making "Incredible Hercules", "Lockjaw and the Pet Avengers", "Exiles", "Agents Of Atlas", and whatever else I'm buying.

Or, like, with DC, I don't care for a whole lot about their current direction. So I don't buy most of their books. However, since, say, "Secret Six" is high-quality stuff and has Catman and Deadshot (and the uproarious Ragdoll), I keep buying it. I'm not supporting, say "Blackest Night" by doing so, or Barry Allen's resurrection. Geoff Johns doesn't see a penny of my money (well, at least not now that Legion of Three Worlds is over. The hell was I thinking?), but Gail Simone and Nicola Bryant do, so I'm totally okay with that. DC and I also have an understanding. They put out comics with the Metal Men in them, and I buy them.

One more thing 'bout Marvel, though. Does anyone else find the smoking ban going on at Marvel to be hilarious? Wolverine can dismember everybody, but can't have a cigar?

138 Scourge wrote:I never get this mentality, myself. I mean, sure, do what makes you happy with your moneys, but to not buy something from a particular company that employs lots of different creators because a few of 'em did dreadfully wrong?

One more thing 'bout Marvel, though. Does anyone else find the smoking ban going on at Marvel to be hilarious? Wolverine can dismember everybody, but can't have a cigar?

The funny part of that is that I hadn't even considered my comment from that angle. I dropped all of Marvel for financial reasons and dropped my pull down to pretty much just AHM and Spotlight. Sucks too because I was getting Thor and was enjoying it. Oh and I still get Buffy Season 8. Awesome stuff the Wheedster's turnin out there. I just meant that I was glad that I hadn't spent money that I would have on something that turned out to be pure suck. The downside is that I've missed out on whatever awesomeness came out as well.

Hadn't noticed the smoking thing but that is kind of funny.

Ah, my bad. I've read a few comments from people saying "Such-and-such is irksome, done with the company", so just figured.

That's ok, I don't really get the mentality either. I have a friend who's often like that and sometimes I have to reel him back in.

Dominic wrote:As far as blaming Loeb, we need to know exactly what Joey Q told him to write. He might have told Loeb to write to pole-reversal in, regardless how much sense it might make.

http://www.comixfan.com/xfan/forums/sho ... hp?t=46252

Jeph Loeb: "So as a way to make the Ultimate line what it HAD been where you could expect the unexpected (a 16 year old Spider-man? The X-Men as Rock Stars?) we decided to find a way to kick over the table and start again. I pitched ULTIMATUM and that gave it all shape."

So yeah, it was his idea, not Quesada's. I'm not sure what he means by making "the Ultimate line like what it HAD been" though. Really what he gives as examples of what is "unexpected" about the Ultimate line shows more of his lack of understanding about the Ultimate Universe. The X-Men were never rock stars, just Dazzler who was a punk rocker before joining the X-Men rather than a disco diva in 616. And Peter being 16? That's how old he was when he got his powers in both versions.

Sparky Prime wrote: just Dazzler who was a punk rocker before joining the X-Men rather than a disco diva in 616.

HA HAH HA HAHAHA HAHAH HA HAHA HAHAHA AHHAHAHA!!! (Deep breath...) Oh, god, oh, dude. I coulda just sworn you said that Dazzler was a punk rocker...Oh, no, that is what you said, isn't it? HA HA HA HAHA HA HA HAH HA HA HA!!!!

Also:

Oh, Ultimate Universe, you were ever so hip.

138 "Adores Disco Dazzler" Scourge.

I really do, too.

138 Scourge wrote:I coulda just sworn you said that Dazzler was a punk rocker...Oh, no, that is what you said, isn't it?

Indeed Ultimate Dazzler was:

(from her first appearance in Ultimate X-Men, issue #42).

Oh, lord, Sparky. Ultimate Marvel is killin' me with the paroxysms of laughter, here. That's amazingly funny...

EDIT: Oh, please tell me that her band launched into a revved-up punk version of "Dancing Queen". That's what I'll assume either way, really.