I was hoping we wouldn't get to the point of completely validating the guy by actually posting pages from his comic.
Hell, we are actively supporting him. If he makes rent this month, I am holding a few people here personally responsible.
Well, as with anyone with an ego problem, the best strategy is not to validate them.
Where have you been? Wacky idea there. But, we might give it a try.
But, anyway, emotionally stunted?
Nah, this is a hate with real depth and legitimacy.
I guess any franchise which could come up with Shattered Glass must have some deepseated emotional problems.
It is more a lack of creativity, which would more get in to the question of being intellectually stunted (which I kind of conflated in to this thread earlier).
"Shattered Glass" is explicitly based on that episode of the original "Star Trek" series, hence the name evoking glass and mirror imagery. A significant number of the character personalities are based on characters in movies, television shows or other comics that the writers recall seeing/reading. The character designs typically take a "spin the colour wheel" approach (which is arguably justified in order to make recolours easier to produce), or are based on existing colour schemes of more obscure toys.
The latter practice is formally called "repurposing", and epitomizes the lack of creativity endemic to Fun Publicatons. Repurposing is essentially reclassifying an existing toy of one character as an entirely new character. (It is customizing for the lazy and untalented.) Fun Publications takes it to a new low and even repurposes toys that are not even appropriate for the characters they have ben reclassified as, mmeaning that they are even being lazy about what toys they lazily repurpose.
Actually, I wonder what the actual creative forces behind the TF IP think about emotional depth? Like, as people. Maybe it doesn't even enter as a factor, because they're still doing business for 80s boys.
Fun Publications does not seem to invest much intellectual capital in to developing their IP. They do not even necessarily follow up on existing story threads. (Granted, nothing is really lost in this case, given the caliber of their work. But, it does show how little thinking goes in to the content that they market and charge money for.)
Ironically, from what I have seen, most of the people who are reading (and liking) the Fun Publications stuff are the guys who came in during the "Beast Years". The comics and text stories are largely *written* by 80s boys. But, I know at least one 80s boy's boy who snorts derisively at Fun Publications output, and calls it fanfic. (This puts me in the odd position of defending Fun Publications on the basis of them being official. But, that is a topic for another thread.)
The best writing from Fun Publications reaches the level of competent hackery and incorporates genre elements reasonably well. (And, even that level of writing is *rare*.) There are obligatory happy/sad/scary moments, but nothing that an 8 year old would not see right through.
Actually, here is a nice and quick way to describe Fun Publications content: "It is just like this other thing, but now with Transformers in it."
Dom raises some points- whether intentionally or not- about relativism here. I mean, Transformers is definitely *less* emotionally stunted than it used to be, and I guess I'm thankful for that. To answer the OP question, yes, relatively it is emotionally stunted. But no, relatively it isn't.
The point I was getting at is that a long-running franchise is going to grow, but will likely suffer some mis-steps along the way.
The caliber of writing in TF has improved over the years, as it has with comics in general. But, to get "Superman: Red Son", the industry arguably had to go through the painfully bad polemicomics of the 70s. Similarly, Hasbro and license holders have a learning curve as well. Hasbro initially marketed TFs as (to use JT's wording from elsewhere) "puzzle toys with personalities".
The developed IP is what put TF above (better designed) toys like "Go-Bots!" back in the 80s. But, there was a trade-off. Fans learned to punish or reward Hasbro (with purchases or angry letters) based as much on the content as on the toys. (I recall fans who dropped the franchise in 1986 after Prime and a number of other characters were killed off.) Hasbro had to make that adjustment.
Right now, I would argue that Hasbro is generally making the right movies in terms of IP development. (They are botching the basics of toy production and distribution. But, that is a question for another thread.) Hasbro is effectively splitting the market.
The Bay movies nicely increased the market presence of "Transformers", profiting from nostalgia as well as new/younger fans. The "Prime" cartoon, for all of its misteps, is an attempt by Hasbro to build and refine its IP. And, it is more polished than previous cartoons, including precious G1. And, the comics are generally being pitched to a different market. Hasbro is allowing IDW to handle "Transformers" like a comicbook. Hasbro learned how much better the comics could be in the 90s when they gave Tokar (along with Furman and Wildman) control of a moribund series for about two years. As a result, companies like Dreamwave and IDW had more creative freedom.
The problem that IDW, and by extension the franchise, is having now relates to the fans. IDW wants to expand the franchise and their market. But, a significant number of the existing fan-base does not want that. In some cases, it is blatant insularity. (I personally know fans who do not want new people coming in to "their" hobby.) In other cases, they are simply unable to deal with comics that are more likely to be pitched higher. And, the potential/new fans are not quite ready to accept TF as a legitimate franchise, regardless of how good the comics may be.
Dom
-would have bailed long ago if not for the comics.