andersonh1 wrote:And I suspect that the fact that I enjoyed that Spotlight quite a bit explains a lot of my opinion of Prowl's current characterization. Because he's fallen a long way since then.
So you do recognize that you're in the minority in preferring that interpretation.
I don't read (or watch or whatever) stories with a big foam finger and a sign promoting a character I like and agree with, I'm not rooting for anyone and I don't 'care' if one or the other comes out on top in a conflict. I'm there to be interested or entertained. Whatever the outcome of the story, so long as it keeps my attention and interests me, I'm the one that wins.
Prowl the logical, pragmatic, ends-justify-the-means behind-the-scenes schemer? That makes (and has made) for some very compelling storytelling. AHM Coda and LSotW are immensely compelling stuff because of that characterization of Prowl. The very concepts of loyalty to an institution itself, rather than strict adherence to its ideals, can be explored in a multitude of ways through Prowl as a character. There's tons of great stuff there that you simply aren't going to get with Prowl as a bog-standard human-savin'-hero, which is a much more straight-laced concept that's easier to predict and less entertaining as a result.
Now, granted, your description of Prowl as Barber's been writing him here, where subtlety, nuance, and concepts of actual pragmatism are thrown out the window in favor of a jerky Autobot-flavored version of Starscream or something, doesn't make it sound like terribly compelling writing either, but I digress. At a purely conceptual level, I would rather have Prowl from LSotW over Prowl from the Spotlight. The latter might be more 'likeable', but the former is far more interesting.
I can see how your interpretation would resonate with some in the audience. But as someone who's had an uncle in the Highway Patrol and a good friend who was a police officer for a number of years, I know how tough their job is. I've got a lot of sympathy for most people in that line of work. It's not a responsibility I'd want.
But, I'm hoping, you also realize that there ARE unsavory, badly-behaved people on the police force as well, right? Not all cops are nice guys, and neither are all Autobots. What makes Prowl so compelling is that he's definitely not a nice guy, but he still believes himself to be fighting for the right thing, and will do anything, regardless of whether it's 'nice' or not, to achieve it. That pragmatism is THE interesting defining element of Prowl that you really DON'T see in anyone else in this series, and I certainly wouldn't want to see it thrown away in favor of a more vanilla heroic interpretation.
As a side-note, I find your distaste for this characterization interesting, since I know you read and enjoyed Superior Spider-Man. Not only was Otto there a very similar example of pragmatic, ends-justify-the-means heroism, but one of the main points of the book itself was the contrast between 'likeable' characters versus 'effective' ones, which is basically the debate we're having here. Granted, Otto and Prowl are execute rather differently (especially now, where I will again concede that Barber's handling of Prowl doesn't sound terribly compelling), but it's an interesting contrast nonetheless.