andersonh1 wrote:Those aren't too bad, all things considered. Particularly the reasonably straight answer about Thundercracker.
I felt similarly, it seemed to me like a step in the right direction.
Dominic wrote:Okay, lets parse this:
Dion is dead. Thankfully, this puts some really bad fanfics to bed. This also casts a shadow on the club figure. I suppose the club Dion figure could be reconciled as being from an alternate timeline or something. (The fact that there is an Ironhide and/or Magnus is most other timelines, including timelines where Dion died, still mercifully rules out the fanon of the 90s.)
If not for Side-gate, (the recent troubles at the wiki owing to the Almanac being written in a self-indulgent way), I get the feeling this would generate more buzz.
Hey, we got a straight answer about it, that's good enough for starters. Now the accolades who have read this answer will spread it among the disinformation to cleanse it away.
Their Thundergate answer was pretty much what I expected. They recognize a problem, but make no promises to do anything about it. Bah.
That's pretty much SOP, they may have one in the pipe for just before the next movie, or they may be holding it for after the movie 3 line, or they may have no actual plans yet, but in all those scenarios it'd be too soon to confirm a figure in the works.
Shockwave wrote:Yeah, so I guess that means we'll get regular Thundy in 2012. Assuming the Mayans are wrong

The Mayans aren't wrong, it's the idiots who are misinterpretting what the Mayans are saying that are wrong. The Mayans are saying "ok, turn a page on the calendar" and the misinterprettors are saying "OH MY GOD THERE ARE NO MORE PAGES IN THE CALENDAR AFTER THIS!!!" (despite there being something like a trillion years left in the potential Mayan calendar system) That said, I don't want to wait until 2012 for ThunderMcCrackers.
G.B. Blackrock wrote:I'm always mystified by questions like that Thundercracker one where the asker seems to legitimately fear that AM Thundercracker (which I do obviously very much want to see get made) may somehow get made, at retail, without a "regular" Thundercracker release. (For my part, I say, "May it actually be so!" But I don't for a moment believe that AM Thundercracker would actually supplant a hypothetical "regular" Thundercracker.)
(I'm almost as mystified that such fans don't count either the BotCon version OR the Henkei versions as somehow legitimate. Folks, you've had a couple of chances already! I'd love for AMTC to have had that many chances!)
The idea that they were even thinking about AM Thunderpants puts a shudder in my nightmares. That AM was pretty much the fugliest color scheme in all of Transformers, and while I don't doubt it has nostalgic appeal to some folks, the idea that it could make mass-market seems really insane to me, but the idea that a product with a recgonizable TF name like Thundercracker could be on pegs looking like that when there hasn't been a chance at the original is downright head-exploding. I mean, for corn's sake, what is
this supposed to be saying? "The designers on this toy were extremely colorblind, and want to ensure that you will be too after looking at it." I just don't see why it should have a place on shelves, if it hadn't already been done once and Hasbro released it now, we'd be yelling our heads off at them for trying something so ugly.
The Botcon version was limited to a $300 set that was 1500 pieces. The Henkei version is an incredibly pricey overseas version. They're both essentially unobtainable.
Honestly, I think some fans put too much stock into those outrageous color schemes from the late '80s and early '90s. Those were bad ideas then meant to tantalize young children into buying product, and nothing more. They are the equivalent of Neon Camo Batman (a real figure!!!), the only reason those exist is to sucker kids and parents with bright colors so they'll buy the same thing again.
Dominic wrote:Hasbro seems to be avoiding releasing a regular colors TC figure. I have no idea why. But, their behavior indicates that they do not, for whatever reason, want to release a toy that would sell.
I disagree that they're actively avoiding it. It's the same mold as the others, they don't want too much of the same mold on shelves so it doesn't have a large window. And its colors are similar to Dirge who is coming out soon. So they have a version of the mold on shelves now, that will be carrying through a couple waves, and then they have another version of the mold that is in similar colors that will be carrying on after that for a few waves, that takes us through the end of the year. Even if they have one planned for March, it's too early for them to reveal that.
Shockwave wrote:No it's not. They used the mold to produce a seeker and instead of making regular TC, they gave us Acid Storm. So they used the mold, had the chance to give us what we wanted and gave us something else instead. It is therefore not unreasonable to think that they would do so again. I really don't see why you're so up in arms about the rest of us wanting a regular TC that we can get at Target for 12 bucks. Arguing for a mass release TC doesn't mean I'm arguing AGAINST AMTC. Best case scenario: The both get released at retail. Barring that I suspect a more likely scenario to be getting mass retail regular TC and AMTC as an exclusive.
I try to give Ass Storm the benefit of the doubt, Hasbro had locked themselves into the exclusivity of those figures at the time, but yeah, enough time had passed that they could have gotten away with it and not given Archer's passing fancy for a green jet a go instead.
AMTC is fine as an exclusive, I just don't think it has a place at mass-retail. It is a nostalgic niche concept that has nothing to say at market today.
G.B. Blackrock wrote:This particular "up in arms" incident started because the Q&A question was worded in such a way as to say, in essence, "no, not this other idea that some folks out there want (i.e., AMTC), but regular Thundercracker." I've said, time and again, this is NOT about AMTC vs. any other particular idea. I don't appreciate it when other people make it look like a competition, as if there is some set number of "slots" available within which all ideas must fit.
We wanted to make sure Hasbro knew we were specifically asking for a regular Thundercracker, not anything else. It wasn't only AMTC that was mentioned as something we weren't talking about, we didn't want to see Hasbro use the answer to make some alternate platform statement one way or the other. We were asking only about the original. The discussion here is where I think this "1 or the other" thing has really come up. But let's be realistic, there are only a set number of slots available, Hasbro Transformers runs their brand in a specific manner, it's a business to them, they can't just drop another repaint on retailers in a case, they have agreements and budgets and schedules to make, so for the mass retail line it really is that sort of competition.
(That, of course, doesn't even get into the question of whether or not Hasbro would have done mass-retail-Thundercracker if only they hadn't done Acid Storm, which I dispute.)
This is true, and yet also inaccurate. There are no guarantees that Acid Storm's slot took over Thundercracker, but Hasbro TF has a thinking that says "we don't want to overload the market on any 1 mold or anything that looks too similar so it has to be spaced out", and figures that are in 1 wave end up carrying over into later waves' cases. So when Acid Storm comes out, it means that for a few cycles there will be no chance for Thundercracker at mass-retail. Ramjet locks out Dirge for 3 months, and Dirge's release will lock out Thundercracker for a few months. If hypothetically they were to re-release Skywarp after Dirge, then Thundercracker won't come out at that time either and would have 3 more months to be in "wait and see" land, and then the movie line puts the Generations line on hiatus and it takes another 18 months to get back to it.
In some ways, it's a bit ass-backwards because there is the whole issue of collectors wanting to get multiple seekers at once, having co-sells that appeal to building up Decepticon forces, but Hasbro feels there are more casual collectors (including kids and parents) who would be more confused by multiple characters in the same mold on pegs at 1 time and wants to ensure their participation in the line.
Anyway, I hope you do get your AMTC, I just hope it's never at mass-retail, that magically Hasbro just mails it to everybody on the list who asks for it.
Speaking of AMTC, looking at the original, at 6 colors spread generously throughout the figure, this one would have to be an exclusive because it would require either extra painting or a double-run of the tooling to get all those crazy colors onto the figure. They can't be molded in 1 pass because some parts are on the tree with others (this is why we'll occasionally see clear parts painted over when they were never meant to be clear) so they have to be molded together or run expensively. So I can say right now with confidence that there is no worry about AMTC at mass-retail, we're never going to see Hasbro pull off a $12 AMTC because it would be a budget-buster. Now, they could do it as an exclusive, but you would probably be looking at some heavy coin, exclusives by their very nature are lower run and thus have to be more expensive to offset the same costs since they can't make back their money in bulk sales, and this one would be extra expensive due to the high number of mixed colors on parts.