Re: Comics are Awesome III
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 7:31 pm
Looks like Booster Gold also has some hints about the future.
http://www.newsarama.com/22215-spoilers ... verse.html
http://www.newsarama.com/22215-spoilers ... verse.html
Welcoming all views from the Transformers community
https://tfviews.com/forums/
In 1939, I'd say - some of the cover dates are a little ahead, I think. Yeah, Batman had death and violence, but he also became more fun, more free-spirited after surviving the worst vampire story ever.anderson wrote:Batman - when Denny O'Neil and Neal Adams took Batman back to his roots, that means back to the way he was in about the first five appearances. I had no idea how quickly Batman went from this dark figure in black and grey to this fun-living, wisecracking guy in bright blue and grey who looks like he's having a great time fighting the crooks. And his puns are just as bad as Robin's. "Quiet, or poppa spank!" Goofy Batman didn't begin in the 60s, it started in 1940. Who knew?
It is a little sad that it's not even the story I'm looking forward to next year, but just the chance to see certain versions of characters again. Why did you do this to me, DC, why?!?!?!?!?JediTricks wrote:Blah blah blah pull lists, blah blah blah minimums, blah blah blah legacy, blah blah blah DC doing another crisis and likely going back on New 52 because fuck New 52.
Have not read it yet, but hardly surprising.Looks like Booster Gold also has some hints about the future.
That sucks. It also does not make much sense. They may as well keep the existing staff if they are going to keep the physical store open. Maybe they are considering closing the store?They are changing the name to their existing store name, Comic Bug, and aren't keeping any of the existing staff, people who have been a part of the community for years.
Ditto.Normally I don't pick up books unless I've finished the current stack, especially when I'm short on money,
I agree on the staff, they should have kept them. The location is choice in that there isn't a lot of competition for the neighborhood and it's the comic shop closest to Sony studios so a lot of staff and execs come in, so I don't think they're planning to close it as they'd gain nothing from the buyout, their other location is too far to make it a branding issue.Dominic wrote:That sucks. It also does not make much sense. They may as well keep the existing staff if they are going to keep the physical store open. Maybe they are considering closing the store?They are changing the name to their existing store name, Comic Bug, and aren't keeping any of the existing staff, people who have been a part of the community for years.
Watch the flow of new arrivals over the next few weeks.
And the thing is, it worked for the character. He survived in print for the next 30 years as a light-hearted crime-fighter when just about everyone else was gone by 1950 except for Superman and Wonder Woman (and Aquaman and Green Arrow who survived as backup features). Batman is so different from the character he started out as and which we're used to today, but the approach sold comics for decades.JediTricks wrote:In 1939, I'd say - some of the cover dates are a little ahead, I think. Yeah, Batman had death and violence, but he also became more fun, more free-spirited after surviving the worst vampire story ever.anderson wrote:Batman - when Denny O'Neil and Neal Adams took Batman back to his roots, that means back to the way he was in about the first five appearances. I had no idea how quickly Batman went from this dark figure in black and grey to this fun-living, wisecracking guy in bright blue and grey who looks like he's having a great time fighting the crooks. And his puns are just as bad as Robin's. "Quiet, or poppa spank!" Goofy Batman didn't begin in the 60s, it started in 1940. Who knew?
I think it's safe to say that lightness AND darkness fit Batman well, but extremes in either become embarrassing quickly.andersonh1 wrote:And the thing is, it worked for the character. He survived in print for the next 30 years as a light-hearted crime-fighter when just about everyone else was gone by 1950 except for Superman and Wonder Woman (and Aquaman and Green Arrow who survived as backup features). Batman is so different from the character he started out as and which we're used to today, but the approach sold comics for decades.
It will probably be explained next issue. Why are you so upset by this?Spoiler
How did she get on the moon, much less know where Mjolnir is? "Guess." (If I had to, probably Freyja or another female Asgardian.) Why would Thor's alter-ego change who Thor is? "Sales!" Bite me.
Because the big fucking push for this book was "Girl Thor!" and the book apparently didn't even deliver that properly in the first issue? The entire reason JT (and pretty much everyone else) grabbed this book was because of all the hype over New Girl Thor, and when the actual comic released is just Old Regular Thor for twenty pages with New Girl Thor only showing up at the end FOR NO RAISIN, you gotta expect some backlash.Dominic wrote:It will probably be explained next issue. Why are you so upset by this?Spoiler
How did she get on the moon, much less know where Mjolnir is? "Guess." (If I had to, probably Freyja or another female Asgardian.) Why would Thor's alter-ego change who Thor is? "Sales!" Bite me.
So why not open by exploring that idea like the people going in for this want to see instead of just having Old Regular Thor punching dudes for twenty pages?The hammer does not make somebody Thor. It confers the power of Thor. Thor (the Asgardian) gets his Thor-power (which sets him above normal Asgardians) from the hammer. But, the Thunderstrike had Thor's powers in the 90s. And, Beta Ray Bill has a hammer that works like Thor's hammer in that it gives him Thor type powers.
This new Thor series is probably going with that idea.