The finale existed, everybody did a thing, not really all that clever or detailed, not a lot of character follow-through, they all just do their thing and then don't matter, it was all quite easy. And Megatron being fooled by the deus ex machina of "goop that fixes Bumblebee for no reason" cybermatter allowing him to get distracted and killed was flat. It was fine for TFP because TFP really didn't deliver much, but it was dumb and predictable and didn't make much sense, and the big payoffs felt underwhelming.
BWprowl wrote:JediTricks wrote:The violence is disgustingly high, and then the thinking is disgustingly low. So you have violence appropriate for a mid-teen audience at youngest, and writing that would enrage a 9-year-old. Who is this show for?
You might recall that I asked almost this exact question regarding those disparate elements waaaaaay back when I was still watching the early episodes of Season 1.
Sure, and I was with you on it, but it's just so much back in our faces again.
Mako Crab wrote:Yep. I called it. Predaking turned on Megatron. Just like Dinobot 2 in BW.

He had better reason than Dinobot 2 though.
Almighty Unicron wrote:Thundertron was supposed to be a major part of the Chinese-only MMO that got quietly canceled and shoved under the rug a few years back for some reason. It's odd that his toy was released in western markets at all IMO.
Transformers Online, it actually came out last year and was abandoned 9 months later. They were using Thundertron because of a push from the novels, not the novels using him because of the game, so it makes a little sense that we got a toy from that same push.
Sparky wrote:That's interesting. I hadn't heard he was supposed to be in an MMO before. Strange how much attention they gave the character. Guess someone at Hasbro just really liked the idea.
And why not? It's a 3rd faction, it's difficult to predict, seems like a good way to push more product. I'm surprised how they backed off so quickly, I guess they were hoping the novel and/or the game would have more legs with the fans than it did.
O6 wrote:Plus, Archer and Andy Schmidt and a bunch of the guys who worked on the "aligned" continuity are now gone from Hasbro, so I suspect we'll return to a mishmash of random bullshit like we got from 2002-2009...
That would be the mishmash of random bullshit that Archer helmed in the first place.
TM wrote:Looking back at the past few years worth of lack luster/bad sales TF toy lines from 2011 thru 2013 gives the answer why these guys got fired.
We don't know they got fired at all. Always talking out your ass with rumors and guesses.
AU wrote:Looking back at the past few years worth of lack luster/bad sales TF toy lines from 2011 thru 2013 gives the answer why these guys got fired.
As opposed to "there's no movie"?
Well, except for the 2011 movie, so no, that doesn't really fit.

BTW, your MMPR Carlton Banks avatar is cracking me up.
Sparky wrote:It's my understanding that Hasbro had to lay off a lot of people company wide because of the economy in general. And Aaron Archer I've seen (mentioned by people at TFW2005 that apparently know the whole story) wasn't fired, but decided to leave Hasbro for other reasons. The guy had been with Transformers since Beast Wars and was responsible for a lot of the franchises success.
The layoffs were understandable, Hasbro had promoted too many key people into VP positions that were about branding more than toys, and the branding doesn't need that many high-paid execs. As for Archer, it doesn't surprise me that he left, his passion was elsewhere for a while.