Onslaught Six wrote:Sparky just hates AHM because he liked Furman's cruddy books. I didn't so AHM is good for me.
That's not why I hate AHM. I was actually looking forward to AHM when it started, but it was not the well thought out story as it should have been. Furman's stories were dreadfully paced (but then, so was AHM), and I did think they needed to change things up. However, his stories were better constructed and was clearly building towards something.
andershonh1 wrote:Not as many as the Wiki makes out. Right after I first read AHM, I took their list on their main page and went through it, and about half the problems are easily explained away, if the reader isn't determined to take the worst possible view of the story and Shane McCarthy.
It is as many as the wiki makes out, if not actually more. I don't see how you can say half of them are easily explained. Heck, IDW had to make the Coda issues just to help explain away some of its inconsistencies, which also added a few more inconsistencies.
For example: the discarding of the six-stage infiltration protocol and the fact that none of Megatron's troops care when they did in Infiltration is bemoaned as a major discrepancy with Furman's work. When in reality, since the situation has changed and the Decepticons have essentially won the war by that point, Megatron is no longer bothered with stealth. Why slowly infiltrate the Earth's political systems and destabilize the planet when they can just conquer it by force? Particularly since Megatron needs to keep his troops busy. The context of the story provides the reason for the change in Decepticon methodology.
Even with the Autobot's out of the picture, the Transformers are supposed to be in the middle of an energy crisis, living off of artificial derivatives since energon is (or was) supposed to be such a rarity in this universe. The whole point of the Infiltration protocol was to get the planets inhabitants to do most of the work, killing themselves, making it easier for the Decepticons to swoop in and conquer the planet. Saves them on the energy they'd have to use doing all the work themselves, with or without the Autobots interference. But McCarthy pretty much threw that all out the window.
An example of a deliberate misreading of the story: To quote the wiki "Worse, the people of New York react to the Constructicons by thinking they're part of a movie being filmed, rather than going "Oh no, the Machination is back!" It's not the "people of New York", it's a few people on one street who may or may not have seen the news reports about the giant robots fighting. Which, by the way, never confirmed the status of those giant robots, so the assumption that it was just movie props doesn't seem all that unreasonable. Regardless, the wiki words it in such a way that it makes the entire city seem ignorant, when that's simply not the case.
I think you're mis-representing what they're actually saying there rather than it being a mis-read on their part.... "People of New York" might be a general description but it's still an accurate way to describe the general audience of New Yorkers on the scene. And you're conveniently leaving out details they pointed out there. The whole point they're making with this is that the humans shouldn't be so in the dark about the existence of the Transformers. Public broadcasts would have gotten international attention. Military personnel had eye witness accounts. How is then that even the ranking military brass thought the robots were just a hoax?
And the whole movie prop thing is hard to swallow. If it was a movie where is the movie crew and all of their equipment? Forget that building a fully functioning vehicle that transforms into an autonomous robot being beyond human technology (with out the help of Transformers at least), not to mention the cost of building one would probably eat up the entire movie budget.
Had the writers at the wiki bothered to be objective rather than just assuming the worst, they might have thought of that. And about half their examples are just as easily explained. A little honestly and a little reading comprehension skill would go a long way.
Again, I'd say they got the criticisms right. It's McCarthy that should have been more comprehensive when he wrote the story in the first place.
Gomess wrote:O6 is implying its greatest faults are inconsistency with other continuity. Being as I have no regard for the Wiki's opinions, and no interest in the rest of IDW's canon, is this really an issue? Would appreciate an answer from Sparky, who's being kinda vague on why AHM sucks so much. Basically, can it be enjoyed as a TF story on its own merits?
In large part, yes, the problems mostly have to do with the continuity. Could it be enjoyed on its own merits? To a degree, perhaps, but I'd still say there were problems with the story.