Re: Video Games are awesome
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 6:09 pm
From your lack of ranting, I take it you didn't mind the endings at all. Very well, I shall spare you my many tirades against bad storytelling and payoffs.
Welcoming all views from the Transformers community
https://tfviews.com/forums/
X-Men is great; I have it on the 360. Well worth the price of admission. I assume what's holding Bucky up (besides obscurity) is licensing--Konami had to jump through a hell of a lot of hoops to be able to release X-Men. (One of the conditions is that they can't change or add anything new--so no retro-DLC for cartoon characters like Gambit. Damn!)Mako Crab wrote:Having plenty of fun with it so far. I did notice that Konami's old arcade X-Men and Simpsons games were up for download, but no Bucky O Hare. I know Bucky was never anywhere near as popular as Konami's other arcade brawlers, but I liked it and wish they'd put it up. Very tempted to score X-Men.
Heavy Rain is supposed to be awesome. RE5 was actually legitimately fun as a co-op shooter, 86 and I played through it a while back--completely ignoring or openly mocking the storyline and not caring about the plot at all, mind you.Can anyone recommend some good games for the PS3 whether they're PSN downloads or actual discs? Not really into 1st person shooters, so no Call of Duty or anything like that. I refuse to go anywhere near Resident Evil 5, 6, or any other RE related games. Part 4 was it for me. Metal Gear 4- not happening. Had my fill of Kratos with God of War 2, so part 3 is out. It's like I'm just not feeling any of the sequels on the PS3.
There go my dreams of playing as Savage Land Rogue. Still, I loved this game in the arcades, and I'm sure I'll get it here. And yeah- I can understand now why they wouldn't bother with Bucky if they gotta jump through all those hoops. It's not like Bucky was a huge money maker for them.Onslaught Six wrote: X-Men is great; I have it on the 360. Well worth the price of admission. I assume what's holding Bucky up (besides obscurity) is licensing--Konami had to jump through a hell of a lot of hoops to be able to release X-Men. (One of the conditions is that they can't change or add anything new--so no retro-DLC for cartoon characters like Gambit. Damn!)
I think that's the only way anyone can play RE5. Before I had a PS3, I watched all the cutscenes on youtube just to see what the story was all about. So I didn't get to say, "At least the gameplay is good!" It was more like, "14 years of build-up and *THIS* is how they choose to end the story?!!?" I saw a free demo of Heavy Rain, so I'll check that out. I played Indigo Prophecy by the same company, and even though I never finished it, it was still good.Heavy Rain is supposed to be awesome. RE5 was actually legitimately fun as a co-op shooter, 86 and I played through it a while back--completely ignoring or openly mocking the storyline and not caring about the plot at all, mind you.
Maybe the ending of part 3 won't bother me, seeing as how I'll be prepared to be let down.Mass Effect is awesome; you miss out on the first game by having a PS3 but ME2 is honestly kind of a better game. It does get a little bogged down in shooteryness, but I played all three games as the class with the most guns who could shoot the most things, so your experience could vary. (It's a third person shooter, not an FPS.)
I am, but at the same time I don't play them very often. I have a bunch of SF, MK, and Soul Calibur, and while they're all great, they spend more time just sitting on my shelf. Not sure I want to bother with more fighting games. Although Pocket Fighter is awesome. Saw it on PSN.If you're into fighting games, let Prowl tell you about BLAHZBLOO.
Okay. Heard lots of good things. Mostly about cake, but still good things.If you haven't played Portal 2, do so. I'd recommend the original as well, but apparently the PS3 port is terrible. The PS3 version is cross-compatible with the PC version, meaning you can actually play with anyone on the PC...and it even comes with a free download of the PC version! Yes, seriously. (The game doesn't have deathmatch or anything; just single player and a co-op two player mode. It also has local co-op as well.)
I do like beat-em-ups. On that note, I noticed that they have Streets of Rage 2 on PSN but none of the others. Made me laugh. Part 2 is pretty awesome, but come on! That's the only one I've ever been able to play! Maybe I want to try the others.If you're into oldschool games (and who isn't?) then get Scott Pilgrim vs. the World. It's especially awesome if you actually like the Scott Pilgrim franchise, but even on its own, it's a rad-as-hell oldschool beat-em-up in the vein of River City Ransom and Double Dragon. Has mild RPG elements but nothing more than RCR had in the day, and they're well implemented, so.
The one where his bionic arm is really his wife, and RAD Spencer has become SAD Spencer? The gameplay looks fun as hell, but I'd have to mute the TV any time Mark Wahlberg tries to do his best Solid Snake impression.GET BIONIC COMMANDO. Not Rearmed or Rearmed 2. (I mean, get those too, they're awesome--Rearmed 1 is better IMO though.) The sequel/3D remake/whatever you want to call it. It's a flawed game (as all of GRIN's games were) but when it's good, it's very good. Given how cheap it is right now (I paid $10 and that was two years ago) it's well worth the price of admission--a middling or even bad $60 game is an awesome $10 game.
Sanctum of Slime or another?Do you like Ghostbusters? Buy Ghostbusters.
You keep your nasty meat sack over there, Mr. 360!!I'd recommend Super Meat Boy but it didn't get a PS3 release. Sucker!
I was looking at Journey and Braid recently. Heard some good things about them, and they *do* look good. I was kinda bummed to find *NO* Ninja Turtles games. No arcade games. No TMNT Smash Up. Where's the turtles?!There's all sorts of other weird middling-type games out there like Prey or Crackdown or Vanquish or Splatterhouse which are sorta-fun in the short term but marred by various things. If you like your games cheaper and with flaws, these are where to go. I have tons of these type of games and I usually don't pay more than $15-20 for them. But I clearly like games with flaws.
Yeah, it looks good, but I've had nothing but bad experiences with 3D Castlevania games in the past. And considering that this one sets out to reinvent the whole series, I'm not so sure. I'll definitely keep it on my watch list though. I'd be willing to give it a chance.I'm currently playing Castlevania: Lords of Shadow, which is fun as hell and generally a great game. The only thing is it sometimes doesn't feel very "Castlevania-y" and part of that, I think, is the music, which barely resembles traditional Castlevania tunes and needs to die in a fire. I play a huge-ass mix of covers and tunes from various bands, old CV games and CDs instead.
I try!Mako Crab wrote:Wow! Lots of good suggestions! Thanks, 06
Obviously not, considering RE6 is hitting in December. And I'll have to get it, too, because I love me some Leon.I think that's the only way anyone can play RE5. Before I had a PS3, I watched all the cutscenes on youtube just to see what the story was all about. So I didn't get to say, "At least the gameplay is good!" It was more like, "14 years of build-up and *THIS* is how they choose to end the story?!!?"
I think SOR2 is generally considered the "best" one of the three. That said, there's a little game called Sonic's Ultimate Genesis Collection which has all the Sonic games from the Genesis era (including stuff like Spinball and the Genesis version of 3D Blast), all the Streets of Rage and Golden Axe games, both Vectorman games, and a bunch of other crap nobody cares about. It's only $20 or so and definitely worth it if you have no other way of playing some of those games (e.g. no earlier compilations, no Genesis). It's worth it alone to get all the Sonic games rather than buy them individually on the marketplace.I do like beat-em-ups. On that note, I noticed that they have Streets of Rage 2 on PSN but none of the others. Made me laugh. Part 2 is pretty awesome, but come on! That's the only one I've ever been able to play! Maybe I want to try the others.
Mark Wahlberg? No no, man. The guy voicing him is Mike Patton, the singer from Faith No More (and other various voice acting gigs). It's pretty worth it just to hear him in the game. (You also can't take it seriously at all. It's pretty GRR GRIMDARK for no reason.)The one where his bionic arm is really his wife, and RAD Spencer has become SAD Spencer? The gameplay looks fun as hell, but I'd have to mute the TV any time Mark Wahlberg tries to do his best Solid Snake impression.
Another; Sanctum of Slime is a crappy multiplayer XBLA game that sucks. It's just called "Ghostbusters," and is basically the Ghostbusters 3 that we never got. All the original actors return to voice their characters, and the game's plot and dialogue was written by Harold Ramis and Dan Akroyd. It's only about $15-20, and I'm not too far in it but so far it's just as fun and funny as the movies. (The second level has you fight the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.)Sanctum of Slime or another?
At least there's a PC version?You keep your nasty meat sack over there, Mr. 360!!
Woah, wait, really?I was looking at Journey and Braid recently. Heard some good things about them, and they *do* look good. I was kinda bummed to find *NO* Ninja Turtles games. No arcade games. No TMNT Smash Up. Where's the turtles?!
Kojima is involved in this one, so I dunno how much that makes you want to try it or skip it. It plays nothing like past 3D Castlevanias. On its release, it was largely called out for playing like God of War only with European horror/fantasy elements rather than Greek ones, but I never played God of War anyway, so. If there's a demo on the PS3, I'd play it, or I'd rent it and play the beginning and see if you dig it. And yeah, story-wise it's kind of a strict reboot but there's enough basic Castlevania elements to keep one satisfied--I particularly like how Gabriel Belmont's armour resembles Simon Belmont's from the NES CV2 box art.Yeah, it looks good, but I've had nothing but bad experiences with 3D Castlevania games in the past. And considering that this one sets out to reinvent the whole series, I'm not so sure. I'll definitely keep it on my watch list though. I'd be willing to give it a chance.
No prob. If I think of any more, I'll let you know. (The majority of the games I mentioned are cross-platform; I have no experience with the PS3 hands-on.)Thanks again for all the suggestions!
At least three of you are around who have the game now. Why aren't you playing it together? I don't think I ever really played the game without at least one other person on my side. (The lack of co-op is the major reason I'm not very excited about FoC.)I really need to get more games for my PS3, but, y’know, money. And time to play them. I’m barely six missions into WfC!
Eh, didn't really think to ask. Plus it's just my first time through the single-player, I figured I might as well see what that's like before I jump into getting mercilessly slaughtered in the multiplayer (one reason I tend to avoid shooters is that I'm just so *bad* at them, reminds me exactly how worthless I would be in a real firefight).Onslaught Six wrote:At least three of you are around who have the game now. Why aren't you playing it together? I don't think I ever really played the game without at least one other person on my side. (The lack of co-op is the major reason I'm not very excited about FoC.)