Objectively, Dinobot is not a bad choice. I just have my own reasons for not voting Dinobot.
My detailed thoughts:
Character voting is open until May 28:
http://www.hasbro.com/transformers/en_U ... E-Poll.cfm
I am voting for Shockwave. I like most of the characters on the list. But, Shockwave is getting my vote by virtue of having a strong presence even with a minimal role on the cartoon. Back in the 80s, "Transformers" was presented as toys, comics and a cartoon. People often forget how important the comics were to the franchise. (The comics are what carried the franchise into the early 90s and were the only content during G2.) Licensiing issues kept Shockwave's presence on the cartoon to a minimum. But, the character played a consistently important role in the comics. Shockwave also played a significant role in the old UK comics. The Hall of Fame write-up is also pretty well written.
Shockwave is probably the longest shot on the list though:
Soundwave: Soundwave is one of those characters that was pretty much everyone's favorite as a kid. I admit to having no small sentimental attachment here. But, as much as I loved Soundwave as a kid and still have a soft spot in my heart for any character that has pets, Soundwave is one of the more dated characters in the franchise. There are people in college now who likely have never seen Soundwave's alternate form, a cassette player, in real life. Soundwave's Hall of Fame write-up lists his tape-troops as Minicons, which raises the ire of the toy-hack crowd. If I was going to vote for Soundwave, that would be reason enough.
Grimlock: I admit, I seriously considered voting for Grimlock. The character objectively has broader appeal than Shockwave, with strong appearances in both the cartoons and comics over the years. In addition to playing a role in the US and UK, Grimlock is also recognizable in Japan. But, Shockwave is a bit more consistently portrayed than Grimlock. (I might vote for Grimlock a few times, as voting restarts every day.)
Jazz: This one should have been a slam-dunk. Jazz is iconic, even making it into 2007 movie in a recognizable way. Jazz is one of the few G1 characters where every re-use of the name has unambiguously been the same character. But, Jazz's "Hall of Fame" write up is...terrible. I am fine with Hasbro revising characters. But, unlike the tweaks to Soundwave, (renaming his tapes as Minicons), that make the character less dated, the changes to Jazz just read like bad fanfic, or the sort of thing that the fanclub would produce.
Dinobot: There is a real case for voting for Dinobot. "Transformers" is not just an 80s property. (The only people who argue otherwise are the more egocentric toy-hacks and/or those who are resistant to change in their hobbies.) And, it is good, (if a bit suprising), to see a character from the Beast-era even nominated for the Hall of Fame. "Beast Wars" saved the franchise in the mid 90s. Dinobot's death in the series is considered by some fans to be the best moment in the history of the franchise. (I would not go that far, but will concede it is probably the best moment in terms of "Transformers" on television.) But, since '01, just about everything "Beast"-related has been terrible. And, "Beast Wars" may have saved the franchise, but it also brought furries into the fandom.
The real folk:
I can think of other choices I would have made for this first batch of inductees. But, none of them are bad choices.
http://www.hasbro.com/transformers/en_U ... EMBERS.cfm
Bob Budiansky:
One of the strongest parts of the "Transformers" brand has always been the intellectual property. Budiansky built much of the foundation for "Transformers" that fans now take for granted. The characters having personalities beyond their names, (ala "Go-Bots!"), was mostly Budiansky. The character profiles that people have wanted to see expanded on in stories over the years were largely written by Budiansky. The fact that people expect TF packages to have character and story content on the back is due in part to Budiansky. There are other people who contributed to the franchise at the beginning, including Ralph Macchio (the comic editor, not the actor), Jim Shooter, Nelson Yomtov, and Herb Trimpe. (And, that list only includes other people working at Marvel, and ignores people working in-house at Hasbro.) But, Budiansky's role was often over-looked, even denigrated, in the 90s. I am can totally support this one.
Peter Cullen:
Cullen's voice went a long way to defiining Optimus Prime. Gary Chalk's voice may have the "oomph" of an energetic and beloved uncle. Scott McNeill has grace to more than match his (enviable) talent. But, Cullen defined Prime. To this day, when I read a TF comic, it is Cullen's voice I hear for Prime's thoughts and dialogue, and that can sometimes cover for some pretty bad writing. Part of me would like to see the late Chris Latta nominated for his work as Starscream, (another character defining voice). And, the petulant part of me wants to see Orson Welles, whose disdain for "Transformers" was well known.
The next two nominees speak very well of Hasbro. Hasbro markes the toys in the US, but they are nominating two guys from Takara. Kudos to Hasbro for keeping these nominations meaningful. Say what I will about Hasbro, but their Hall of Fame is not just a series of in-house pats on the back.
Yoke Hideaki: This guy is responsible for the "Microman" line. For that alone, I almost want to argue that he should be on another list entirely. ("Microman" is a truly amazing line, relating to both "GI Joe" and "Transformers".) Hideaki is also credited with creating a number of toys there were later presented as TFs, including Soundwave.
Kojin Ohno: Another Microman guy, Ohno is credited with working on the old Diaclone line where many of the original TF vehicles were drawn from. He also played a role in designing Fortress Maximus and with launching the "Beast Wars" brand in Japan.
Dom
-plans to post more FCBD reviews this week. Honestly. No, really. Totally going to.