Re: crazy customizing questions and discussion
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:40 pm
Or regular Starscream "White Starscream". Actually, no, scratch that. 
Welcoming all views from the Transformers community
https://tfviews.com/forums/
We don't. I think this was 86 and me making vague biased assumptions. Kind of like how Purple Flamethrower Seeker is so obviously Wasteland.Dominic wrote:Wait, do we have a source on this? I thought the character profile referenced "Machine Wars".
Dom
-oi...
It bothers me in both cases for more or less the same reasoning. It is lazy. And, particularly when fans do it, it is self indulgent. ("I do not have a legitimate figure of x-character, but I am going to say I have a figure of x-character.")It bothers me when it is done in an official capacity, like Movieverse Armorhide being SG Huffer, but how people play with their toys on their own doesn't do anything to diminish the characters that are already there.
This smells an awful, (and I do mean "awful"), lot like fan fic.Repurposing works in a pinch, and when the toy you're using doesn't have very much attachment to yourself.
"Well, it works, aside from all that stuff that does not work."Cybertron Landmine is, easily enough, a distinct homage/new toy of the G1 guy in several ways. (His altmode may be different and some details don't match up, but there have been worse homages and new toys.
I blame Fun Publications, and to a less degree Hasbro, for making this kind of half-assery okay. This year's Metal Hawk and Overlord look like the sort of custom jobs that I would expect from a lazy, (or maybe just young), customizer. The repurposing is just lazy, and made even worse when it is for crap like "Shattered Glass". The official sources really should not be pulling that kind of shit. (And, why the fandom entertains it, I will never understand.)Metalhawk, though, has had two figures in 25 years. One of them is prohibitively expensive and rare and not that good anyway; the other is a G1 Japanese exclusive toy. (ohoho, see what I did there?)
I would customize an Optimus if I could do it *better* than Hasbro, either in terms of paint applications or moulding. Granted, I cannot. But, there are people who can. But, just repurposing a toy (to say nothing of acting like that is creativity), is fucking lazy.But you've got a point. For example, I (personally) would never customize a figure to represent Optimus Prime, simply because there are literally dozens of Prime figures I could get that could easily represent the character. (
It is just a question of establishing a cut-off. "Expensive" is a function of one's income and the perceived value of the item in question. I would see $5 for a broken toy as being less of a value than $25 for a complete toy. Of course, in absolute terms, $25 is a bit high right now. (Being so close to finishing a certification, and getting another, I have to start thinking of working more on my loans and planning for my future, rather than being content to tuck away a few bucks a week, hence my cutting back on toys of late.)Rarity and price are sometimes difficult to ascertain. I can get a G1 Slapdash (in various conditions and missing, or not missing, various parts) for between $9-15 easy. Energon Cliffjumper, on the other hand, costs about $20+ and shipping. But which would I rather have?