Re: Robots in Disguise (IDW G1 ongoing)
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:13 am
Quick, everyone! Use it on other boards so I can be internet-famous like I always wanted!
Welcoming all views from the Transformers community
https://tfviews.com/forums/
Weren't you already...you know, forGomess wrote:Quick, everyone! Use it on other boards so I can be internet-famous like I always wanted!
Hey, there are plenty of "Armada" junior novels. They are shit, but they meet the standard you describe.Gomess wrote: For real, I will take any TF story about *Robots in Disguise* on Earth.
Well they don't, then.Dominic wrote:They are shit, but they meet the standard you describe.
The spec isn't "arbitrary", it's my *personal taste*, you daft bugger.Dominic wrote:Why read something bad just because it meets an arbitrary spec?
"Hi, I'm Dom. I buy comics I don't really like or aren't interested in because of arbitrary reasons like certain writers being on the book, or because I am looking for filler, despite being several months behind on legitimately good books like Cobra or TF, or simply not buying books like Atomic Robo."Dominic wrote:Just out of curiosity, why? Why read something bad just because it meets an arbitrary spec?
I can't because I can't ever be fucked with CamelCase bullshit and remembering what's what. I'm just going to call it RID because, realistically, we aren't ever going to be talking about this and the 2001 RID series in the same breath--with the explicit exception of when we're debating the fact that they're called the same thing. (My lack of effort concerning CamelCase is probably half the reason I quit computer programming.)Shockwave wrote:I could get behind the RiD/RID distinction.