Watchmen movie discussion

A general discussion forum, plus hauls and silly games.
User avatar
Mirage
Gestalt Combiner
Posts: 299
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: Watchmen movie discussion

Post by Mirage »

Still digesting, but I enjoyed it overall. I found the complaints about the acting to be mostly unfounded-- I actually liked Dan and Laurie's portrayals quite a bit. The one character I had a problem with was Sally. Carla Gugino (whom I've always liked) plays it to perfection as the young Sally, but kind of falls apart as the old version. It's almost like she knew the makeup sucked (and it did) and it hurt her performance.

Jackie Earl Haley damn well deserves *something* for his portrayal of Rorshach-- just awesome. An Oscar nod might be a bit much to hope for, but damn, at least toss a Golden Globe his way or something.
I disappear.
User avatar
Rampage01
Deluxe
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 4:35 pm

Re: Watchmen movie discussion

Post by Rampage01 »

onslaught86 wrote:Not a 300 fan, so pleased to see this emerge as more than bluescreen and posteuring.
Good to know.

I'm not a fan of 300, either, and was getting the impression from the trailers that this movie was going to be like 300 with costumed heroes.
User avatar
donosaur
Gestalt Combiner
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:00 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Re: Watchmen movie discussion

Post by donosaur »

I'm not sure how a man can make his face twitch that much and not explode.

Coupla other things: I wondered whether or not the child murderer bit would go down like in the comic, seeing as how Rorschach basically gives him a choice like in Saw. I figured the hacksaw bit would be gone, but he'd still burn him alive. I guess there's something to be said for getting to actually see him exact justice, rather than walk off while it occurs. I dunno.

As for the Batman posters, I understand it as thus: The entire movie is a pastiche. That's my ultimate interpretation. It explains all the recognizable, evocative music, the Shumacher costumes, David Bowie and Mick Jagger hanging out in the montage, everything. While the film still takes place in alternate 1985, it acknowledges everything that has happened in our world since then. So yeah, Batman is there just because it fits, not because it makes sense, exactly.

EDIT: I did notice that when Comedian chucks the coffee mug, it hits the door and knocks the 1 off of 3001. Can anyone who owns the comic find out if he lived in 3001, or if it's entirely fabricated so Snyder can give us a wink?
.................................................................................................................................................................... _,_,_..
...................................................................................................................................................................(..vvvvv
..................................................................................................................................................................(..../"/"
.........................................................................................................................................................(\.....(.....) )
......................................................................................................................................................... \ \../../hh hh
User avatar
Onslaught Six
Supreme-Class
Posts: 7023
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:49 am
Location: In front of my computer.
Contact:

Re: Watchmen movie discussion

Post by Onslaught Six »

Oh! Totally forgot.

'Garry Chalk' is in it! He's the one douchebag military adviser guy. He's not credited on IMDB (or possibly even in the credits, I didn't stay to see) but it's definitely him.
BWprowl wrote:The internet having this many different words to describe nerdy folks is akin to the whole eskimos/ice situation, I would presume.
People spend so much time worrying about whether a figure is "mint" or not that they never stop to consider other flavours.
Image
User avatar
BWprowl
Supreme-Class
Posts: 4145
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: Shelfwarming, because of Shellforming
Contact:

Re: Watchmen movie discussion

Post by BWprowl »

His name is in the credits. I saw it there and was all 'Woah, really?!'.
Image
User avatar
138 Scourge
Supreme-Class
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:27 pm
Location: Beautiful KCK

Re: Watchmen movie discussion

Post by 138 Scourge »

Way late getting in, but screw it:

I went from "cool, Watchmen movie" to "eh, whutevah, Watchmen" and back since the previews a-started, but wound up going to see this thing anyway. Not too bad, really.

I'll second the missing the story of how Rorscharch got his mask. I loved that bit in the comics, and don't think the important thing about that bit was what the mask was made of, but who it was made for. The whole Genovese thing is a pretty clear example of what kind of world would make a guy want to go out and hand out the beatings. Plus, the line "Cut it enough that it didn't look like a woman anymore", that's just creepy, but in a good way, so you see that this guy's pretty much batshit.

I missed the squid. And losing the squid kinda took a lot of of Viedt's conspiracy, I thought. New ending doesn't bother me, really, but still, I wish the squid had been around.

On some really minor points, some of the characters in the book that you get to know and get used to (Bernie the news vendor, the kid reading the pirate comics, the taxi driving-lady and even Bubastis) end up as just kinda cameos, so when they're killed...I dunno, I remember being kinda shocked by the news-guy and kid dying in the book, and that kind helps you put a face on New York getting nuked. And since the kitty didn't even get mentioned before the climax, you don't get a since that it's something Veidt cares about as much when she gets nuked.

But really, most of what I didn't care for about the movie was just due to it not being able to translate for the big screen. There's a lot of lines, (most of Nite Owl's lines, and Doctor Manhattan's Mars speech) that read a whole lot better than they sound. Still, overall, I liked it okay. I think Watchmen came out as good as a Watchmen movie could (though I would love to see what Terry Gilliam would have done with it).

Still kinda sad that we're not getting really bad superhero toyline stuff out of it, though. I was so looking forward to a brightly colored Rorsharch with a spinning blade launcher or something...
Dominic wrote: too many people likely would have enjoyed it as....well a house-elf gang-bang.
User avatar
Onslaught Six
Supreme-Class
Posts: 7023
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:49 am
Location: In front of my computer.
Contact:

Re: Watchmen movie discussion

Post by Onslaught Six »

138 Scourge wrote:(Bernie the news vendor, the kid reading the pirate comics
Watchmen Funfact: That kid is also named Bernie.
Still kinda sad that we're not getting really bad superhero toyline stuff out of it, though. I was so looking forward to a brightly colored Rorsharch with a spinning blade launcher or something...
A friend and I were experimenting with writing a mock script for a horrible mid-90s Watchmen movie adaptation. It was...interesting.
BWprowl wrote:The internet having this many different words to describe nerdy folks is akin to the whole eskimos/ice situation, I would presume.
People spend so much time worrying about whether a figure is "mint" or not that they never stop to consider other flavours.
Image
User avatar
138 Scourge
Supreme-Class
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:27 pm
Location: Beautiful KCK

Re: Watchmen movie discussion

Post by 138 Scourge »

Onslaught Six wrote:
138 Scourge wrote:(Bernie the news vendor, the kid reading the pirate comics
Watchmen Funfact: That kid is also named Bernie.
I thought about referring to 'em as "The Bernies", but the kid goes by "Bernard". Still, I tried to work that into my commentary, but it was late and I was tired, so I couldn't word it right and gave it up.

So this script, is was deliberately horrible? I'd almost want to check it out, if so. Jean-Claude Van Damme as Dr. Manhattan, Treat Williams as Nite-Owl, Tia Carerre as Silk Spectre, Jim Carrey as Rorsarch, and Adam Sandler as the Comedian!

On that note, the casting of the proper Watchmen movie was friggin' perfect. Everyone looked just right.
User avatar
BWprowl
Supreme-Class
Posts: 4145
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: Shelfwarming, because of Shellforming
Contact:

Re: Watchmen movie discussion

Post by BWprowl »

Onslaught Six wrote:A friend and I were experimenting with writing a mock script for a horrible mid-90s Watchmen movie adaptation. It was...interesting.
That wouldn't have anything to do with this, would it?
Image
User avatar
Onslaught Six
Supreme-Class
Posts: 7023
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 6:49 am
Location: In front of my computer.
Contact:

Re: Watchmen movie discussion

Post by Onslaught Six »

BWprowl wrote:
Onslaught Six wrote:A friend and I were experimenting with writing a mock script for a horrible mid-90s Watchmen movie adaptation. It was...interesting.
That wouldn't have anything to do with this, would it?
No, see, that's still sorta-kinda accurate. Sorta.

In our adaptation, The Comedian was a literal stand-up comic. That's how bad this was.
138 Scourge wrote:So this script, is was deliberately horrible? I'd almost want to check it out, if so.
I dunno if I still have a copy anywhere. If I find it, I'll put it up.
BWprowl wrote:The internet having this many different words to describe nerdy folks is akin to the whole eskimos/ice situation, I would presume.
People spend so much time worrying about whether a figure is "mint" or not that they never stop to consider other flavours.
Image
Post Reply