Hasbro's going pc on us! It's like Optimus Primal is running the company or something!!Onslaught Six wrote:Well, if nothing else cool comes up before February, I'll support it. It's not like anyone else is gonna ask it.

Hasbro's going pc on us! It's like Optimus Primal is running the company or something!!Onslaught Six wrote:Well, if nothing else cool comes up before February, I'll support it. It's not like anyone else is gonna ask it.
I'll be honest, I don't understand switching from 5 to 3 for a bi-monthly Q&A. 5 at least feels substantial, you can wait a couple months to get 5 answers, but 3? That's almost like a sample at best. It's gonna be really rough to choose the best 3 questions in Feb, that's for sure.Onslaught Six wrote:That's understandable, I guess, though every month would rule.
Strikes me as likely that there's simply too many sites submitting questions, and that this is their compromise to keep everyone able to ask them. How many sites submit SW Q&As?So, some not-so-great news about Q&A. It appears that Hasbro TF cannot handle the Q&A load of 5 questions per site every 2 months, so they are lowering the load to 3 questions per site. I am going to try to get Hasbro to at least answer questions more often then, every 2 months is ridiculously long for just 3 questions.
I find that doubtful. It's a bigger collector market, absolutely, but I'd wager Hasbro make more money from TF on a product-by-product basis as they completely own Transformers as a brand.Remember, though, the SW brand is a much larger piece of Hasbro's pie than Transformers is--or at least, I'd assume it is.
TF outperformed SW in '07, I think they were on pace year before that, and in '04 I think TF outperformed then too. And Lucasfilm doesn't answer anything, it's all the Hasbro team. Lucasfilm licensing division generally is more a hindrance to design than a help, constantly sending things back until they're done right.Onslaught Six wrote:Remember, though, the SW brand is a much larger piece of Hasbro's pie than Transformers is--or at least, I'd assume it is. They've also got Lucasfilm's flunkies helping them out on stuff. I'd imagine they were expecting a turnout among the same as the GI Joe team, but they got instead...well, us.
Someone owns the trademark Jazz for a car, yet we have Autobot Jazz. That argument doesn't hold water and doesn't fit their answer. Bluestreak is a phrase in the lexicon, that should make it generic enough, yet it doesn't for some reason. There's far more to it with stuff like that. This is what Hasbro gets for using too many lazy G1 names.onslaught86 wrote:Re: Trademarks, the reason there's no Autobot_Bluestreak is because some other company owns the trademark to Bluestreak. We get Autobot_Jazz and friends because Jazz, Hound, Grapple, and Ravage are all deemed 'generic words'. Individually, they're not strong enough for Hasbro to hold the trademark, so they add something onto it to strengthen it.
They capped it at 20 sites per round, and from mid-December until February it's back to bi-weekly with SW.Strikes me as likely that there's simply too many sites submitting questions, and that this is their compromise to keep everyone able to ask them. How many sites submit SW Q&As?
No, it's what 'Budiansky' gets.JediTricks wrote:This is what Hasbro gets for using too many lazy G1 names.