New 5 part comic: Sins of the Wreckers

The modern comics universe has had such a different take on G1, one that's significantly represented by the Generations toys, so they share a forum. A modern take on a Real Cybertronian Hero. Currently starring Generations toys, IDW "The Transformers" comics, MTMTE, TF vs GI Joe, and Windblade. Oh wait, and now Skybound, wheee!
User avatar
Dominic
Supreme-Class
Posts: 9331
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:55 pm
Location: Boston
Contact:

Re: New 5 part comic: Sins of the Wreckers

Post by Dominic »

Sin of the Wreckers #3:

It appears that the
Spoiler
Verity/Stakeout
shipping was me jumping at shadows. This is for the best.

Roche goes back to the ends:means ethics questions from "Spotlight: Kup",
Spoiler
with Prowl being
idea man and
Spoiler
Tarantulas being
the execution guy.

So far, so good (just as well, as 3 issues out of 5 is a bit late to be dropping a series).

Grade: B
User avatar
Dominic
Supreme-Class
Posts: 9331
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:55 pm
Location: Boston
Contact:

Re: New 5 part comic: Sins of the Wreckers

Post by Dominic »

Bought the compilation yesterday. I will probably get to it in the next few weeks.
User avatar
andersonh1
Moderator
Posts: 6459
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:22 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: New 5 part comic: Sins of the Wreckers

Post by andersonh1 »

Dominic wrote:Bought the compilation yesterday. I will probably get to it in the next few weeks.
I was interested in this series, but apart from I think the 2nd issue, never saw it on the shelf at my lcs, and never got around to adding it to my pull list. I haven't been happy with IDW's Transformers output for awhile anyway, but I would like to read your review.
User avatar
Dominic
Supreme-Class
Posts: 9331
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:55 pm
Location: Boston
Contact:

Re: New 5 part comic: Sins of the Wreckers

Post by Dominic »

Either "Sins of the Wreckers" or "Revolution" is likely to be my last chance for IDW "Transformers", at least until an editorial or creative change. I am not looking to drop TF entirely. But, at this point, I have been unimpressed for so long that it is fast becoming inevitable.
User avatar
Dominic
Supreme-Class
Posts: 9331
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:55 pm
Location: Boston
Contact:

Re: New 5 part comic: Sins of the Wreckers

Post by Dominic »

Finally got around to reading "Sins of the Wreckers" over the weekend.

Over-all, it is a good expansion on the premise of "Last Stand of the Wreckers". Roche does a solid job of depicting nuanced monsters in a cast that largely consists of the irresponsible and dishonest.

Verity (a character with one of the most useful and thematic names in comics) stands for honesty, but her
Spoiler
call for honesty is tainted by her willingness to commit extortion.
Legitimate grievances are tainted by revenge. And, good intentions are muddied by bad actions.

Roche flirts a little too much with shipping
Spoiler
in regards to Prowl and Tarantulas.
But, the dynamic is
Spoiler
creepy enough
to make it palatable, if only
Spoiler
by virtue of highlighting inherent wrongness.
There are a few panels where the art is unclear in the later chapters. (Maybe Roche was still sorting out the problems that caused the series to be delayed?) And, there is a really stupid bit of contrivance
Spoiler
involving Iron Fist's remains
.

Questions about Prowl are resolved decisively enough by the end. I have no doubt that somebody (likely Barber) will use Prowl again. And, Prowl may well get
Spoiler
a shot at redemption. But, I want to see an intelligent case for why Prowl may or may not deserve that shot.
Either way, regardless of what happens next, it will be impossible to continue the previous holding pattern with Prowl. (One nice touch was Roche reconciling something that some people considered problematic about Costa's run.
Spoiler
Prowl gets periodic bouts of guilt. Presumably, Costa's run depicted one of those.
The back-matter includes notation on each chapter, both what was included in the final draft and plot points that were not. There is a significant back-write
Spoiler
involving Springer.
Given the reputation that Roche has, there was almost certainly a temptation to claim that
Spoiler
Springer's origin
was always planned to some degree. While I do not like back-writes, I applaud Roche's honesty in owning it.


Grade: B
Post Reply