Given the timeline, I am more willing to believe Nightbeat was brought back as a matter of course and the recolour was made after the fact. "Who's in this that would make a cheap and easy remould? Nightbeat? Yeah, that'll work." The fact that Nightbeat is not drawn as either the Jazz remould he was solicited as or the final Bumblebee retool is the strongest indicator of this to me.Dominic wrote:But, they brought back Nightbeat (a c-lister) to tie in with that stupid recolour during "Dark Cybertron"
Before this becomes an 80 page argument: No one cares. Regardless of what he was 30 years ago, Blastoff is now a jet. You both make decent points. Hasbro probably went with cost saving and modern sensibilities over slavish 80s reproduction. Not the first time it's happened in this line, and it won't be the last.Sparky Prime wrote:Yeah, I know... Still doesn't change the fact the space shuttle itself was never intended to be an armed vehicle like the other Combaticons are. The others are all meant to be used for combat, while the space shuttle seems out of place in that regard. Sure the shuttle could have been used to set up space-based weapons like the proposed "Star Wars" plan, but that still doesn't make it a combat vehicle.Dominic wrote:Keep in mind that the Combticons were designed 30+ years ago, and would have taken design cues from several years earlier. The association between shuttles and the military would have been stronger then. I am old enough to remember (albeit through much younger eyes) Reagan's SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative, "Star Wars"....and boy howdy did that name stir up the pot). It was all about space based weapons (or the *idea* of space based weapons).
Blastoff aside, what would this have to do for this to be ideal for you? The colour variants are less of a problem than you're making it out to be; it's only Onslaught that the problem is on and I'm very much hoping that the phrase "running change" is more indicative of what Hasbro did with G1 and Armada Megatron (one SKU, two variants in the case) and the various Marvel Legends ladies and henchmen that have happened for the last year or two. (If you haven't been following along, most case assortments of Marvel Legends recently have one toy in the case that is an equally-packed variant, to "get around" only having so many females or henchmen in a line. It's actually pretty clever. One recent ML wave had the female Captain Marvel and Scarlet Witch sharing a spot.)Dominic wrote:COMBINER WARS BRUTICUS:
Easy skip. Blast-off should have been replaced with a new character if Hasbro could not come up with money for a new mould (on a combiner that is mostly retooling to begin with). The colour variants just add a new problem in that assembling a correct set is that much more difficult. (I really like the Combaticons as characters, but have yet to see a good Bruticus set.)
Even if there are two Onslaught variants shipped at different dates, it simply becomes a case of finding the one you want the most. Each is equally accurate to one interpretation and each compromises in some way--the way the toy is designed, the chest plate becomes the surrounding parts of the missile assembly in the vehicle mode, which will be silver if you get the toy-accurate silver chestplate but brown if you get the cartoon (and FOC) accurate brown chestplate, and will probably look more like Onslaught in vehicle mode. It's another "Hasbro/Takara CW Magnus" debate--you can get red thighs but you have to deal with the out-of-nowhere Alpha Trion, or you can get Minimus Ambus and deal with white thighs. (I cannot understand your usage of "correct" set as there is no such thing in this case; literally a matter of preference.)
Those two things aside, there is nothing I don't love about Bruticus. Except probably that his weapons won't combine into an awesome thing like Ruination, but that's an ongoing complaint I have with CW that I haven't properly voiced. (Have I mentioned that I hate that none of the weapons combine into superweapons? How do you miss the boat on that? It's a few frickin' pegs and holes!)
Sky Lynx is literally not even in Combiner Wars, is he? His "association" is a label on a frickin' box. Throw the box away!Glad to see that Hasbro is not breaking its recent trend of disappointing me with larger toys that I initially want. Even putting aside the fact that Sky Lynx is associated with a crappy comic, the fact that the new figure reportedly cannot split in to the two components annoys me. (I could probably work around the associations with the new comics if the toy were better.)
This entire toy legitimately looks like it would have been better off as a new Wheelie. The colours, the blue windshield, everything except the Wreck-Gar head are SCREAMING "Wheelie" to me. What a lost opportunity. (It would even make sense for him to combine with an Optimus, given their history in the comics during the Orion Pax period.)Wreck-Gar:
Looks too "clean" to be a Junkion. Not a bad mould in general. But, the wrong mould for the character in this case.
Aside: Am I the only one extremely disappointed by the fact that sometimes "official pictures" literally mean "CGI renders" now? Of all the terrible practices they could have lifted from third parties, they chose THAT?! It looks tacky, it doesn't give an accurate representation of the actual product, and it doesn't do ANYTHING for scale because there's no camera and physical object. Look at Legends Shockwave there--he almost looks like he could be a Voyager for Chrissake. That's terrible.