Sparky Prime wrote:All I see there is that it's pointing out the era they've traveled to is obsessed with function of form, where any little thing like a vehicle riding on public transit can be considered an offence. It's world building, showing us what Cybertron was like, not a direct statement to the audience.
Exactly. By showing that attitude and equating it as being bad, Roberts is directly stating that people like me, who *enjoy* seeing TFs transform and use their altmodes, are bad people. I really shouldn't have to feel this way reading a *Transformers* comic.
After all, the issue as you've already pointed out also showcases several characters making use of their alt modes, completely contradicting what you're suggesting here.
Hence my confusion. Roberts clearly has it out for people who care about transformation as a showcase, but then he goes and writes a bunch of it in here. So what's his game? Is getting me excited over seeing altmode use then yanking me back and calling me a bastard for doing so the entire gimmick here?
Except it doesn't undermine transformations or any of that. If Whirl wants to be a watchmaker instead of a member of the Ariel Corps simply because he turns into a helicopter, why can't he? That's the only point they're making, that they have their own interests and skills that doesn't necessarily have to do with what they turn into.
Did you miss the part afterwards where they talk about how they'll be asked about their altmodes and made to showcase their transformations, and discussed what horrible fascists those who did so were?
What am I then, when I see pictures of a new TF toy coming out or a new character being introduced, and immediately think "What do they turn into? How do they work?"
This is exactly what Roberts is talking about with this.
I'm pretty sure that's just how you've chosen to interpret it, because that's not at all what I've gotten out of the series.
Because you're incapable of detecting theming and subtext?
Dominic wrote:The whole point of the comic is to make directly explicit what some of the better TF comics have been about over the years, specifically that there is more to TF that "big transforming space robots". Yes, they are big space robots. Yes, they transform.
But, that is not the only thing TF comics are, or have been, about.
But you can focus on those other parts without damning the former portions, or the people that do enjoy them. Roberts's previous works, like LSotW and Chaos Theory, were great stories that, indeed, didn't focus much on the transformation aspect of the Transformers and instead went deeper into them as individuals, as characters, and how their society and the war that shaped it worked. But they also did so without constant, repetitive diatribes on how shitty and stupid the transformation aspect was, and without working towards and apparent agenda to just remove transformation from the fiction entirely, because Roberts apparently hates it and what it represents so much.
That was a running gag from the old file-cards.
Why on Earth would the bios for the toys they were trying to sell tell the prospective customers how stupid and horrible the central gimmick of said toys was?