You could write a thesis paper on this. We could sit here all day listing the similarities and differences.Question: has the IDW G1 continuity broken enough with the traditional G1 continuity to warrant separation of IDW continuity from "G1"?
The way I've always seen it is, IDW takes no more "inspiration" from G1 than it does any other iteration of the franchise does--the films, Animated, Prime, RID, Armada, whatever--and could very well stand as its own "iteration." The only thing is, most of those series are focused on being, for lack of a better term, a specific iteration. Animated is basically G1 except the main Autobots are young and stupid and everything looks wonky; Prime is G1 except everybody is CGI and some random different crap for some reason; RID is G1 except everybody is anime and using 1999 toy designs, Armada is G1 except with Minicons. What does IDW bring to the table in terms of that? Sure, it's got random superficial differences (Galvatron isn't Megatron, everybody shows up on modern Earth instead of 1984, etc.) but on the whole, at the end of the day, it's Just "Transformers"--no ifs, ands, or buts, like with Prime or Animated or RID.
I mean, out of everything, G1 is where it fits "best," but whatever.
Uh, Star Saber is from Victory. (Energon had a guy with the same name, but is mostly irrelevant.) I'd recognize him. Victory is, you know, a whole cartoon series. Any TF fan worth his salt should at least know the main two leaders from it.Um, what country do you think this is, man? "Well duuuuh, it's some guy you've probably heard of at most barely once back during Energon - GOSH!"
I didn't recognize Star Saber either.
Of course, that's the point of the model. You want to be up to date? Gotta buy the floppies. You just want to read it and don't care about when? Wait a while.They do, but they're a few months behind the floppies. The late July TPB vol 4 collects to issue 16, where we just got issue 18 in floppies last week.