Tigermegatron wrote:Takara doesn't care about fine details like some/most on-line TF fans think they do. If they did,we would have never got the Alternators/BT/Alternity toy line that gave most of the Iconic characters liscense cars modes & robot modes that looked nothing like the 1980's G-1 TF toys designs. At the time takara labeled these toys high end,almost MP style TF toys aimed at hard core collectors.
The Alternators/Binaltech/Alternity line wasn't supposed to look exactly like the 1980's toy designs. They were supposed to be extremely detailed versions of real modern day cars that transform into G1 characters. And granted some of them, Decepticons in-particular, looks very little like the G1 counterparts but the Binaltech story explains those bodies as being stolen from the Autobots before their spark's could be transferred. The line(s) itself still had a great deal of care put into the details.
If Takara cared about the FINE details they would have created Classics/Generation TF toys in the proper size scales. Due to some 2.0 TF toys( powerglide,onslaught,silverbolt) being over sized this caused some 2.0 toys (Galvatron,Cyclonus,) that deserved the bigger toys get the smaller sized toys. Classics/Generations are TF toy lines aimed towards the old school fans & Yet Takara/Hasbro gets these toys wrong more than they do right.
If Takara cared about the FINE details then why does almost every new soundwave toy get recolored into blaster. Why does almost every new bumblebee toy get recolored into cliffjumper. This smells of laziness coupled with who cares & a bit of cheapness thrown in.
Those are mass-produced toy lines. It's a whole lot different for those lines than it is for the Masterpiece toyline.
YEAH SPARKY WILL PROBABLY MIS-READ EVERYTHING LIKE HE ALWAYS DOES,SAY SOMETHING LIKE YOU DIDN'T SAY THAT,THEN CREATE NUMEROUS THREADS REPEATING HIS MESSAGE & DISTORTING OTHER/MY MEMBERS FACTS.
You have got to be kidding me with this. Now you're just singling me out and personally attacking me
completely out of context. None of that is true. Show me one time I've actually mis-read one of your posts, because I doubt that's ever happened. And of course I'm going say "I didn't say that" when I've been
completely mis-quoted by someone. That's the
main reason I've had to repeat myself so many times with you in the first place, and I am not the only one that's had to do that, nor have I ever made a new thread to repeat a point. It certainly wasn't me who was distorting facts and then accusing people of trolling and flame baiting when
several people pointed out those errors. So stop
FALSELY accusing me of this crap.