Dominic wrote:A recent TFA sourcebook, written by Sorenson, had a verbal Easter Egg that set off all kinds of drama. (It had to do with movie Sideways being the same as UT Sideways.) Sorenson later said, "oh, but not really", meaning he put something into the sourcebook just for the hell of it, despite there being no need for it to have been in there. (Because, apparently official sourcebooks are the place for writers to just stick their whimsy.)
I actually had to agree with Willis about how he handled it. The fact I had to agree with Willis only makes the incident even worse.
I think people just overreact to this kind of thing. Yeah, there was the one line about Sideways heading off for another dimension, but I don't know if it's worth filing that away as a total serious fact. So then when "drama" erupts over something so minor, it just kind of makes me shake my head. Sheesh.
It's right up there with the thing in the Drift series, wherein Milne drew in a couple cameos of dead Transformers that sure could look like UT Hot Shot and SG Ravage. Which, y'know, two guys that aren't likely to show up in the regular G1 stories anyway, right? Now, Willis is all nuts for Hot Shot, and "created" SG Ravage, so it's read (whether correctly or not) as a slam on him. So people flip their shit over that (not Willis, though, surprisingly), and call out Milne for killing these dudes (who, again, not likely to show up, anyway). And when the editor says "Milne doesn't control what characters live or die" Willis does get all butthurt. Jesus, it's like...it's an Easter egg thing, not worth taking seriously. Do people get butthurt when Cy-Kill shows up dead in a background?
As for Dinobot, Willis did swing the vote. He swung it in a self-indulgent and wanky way. But, if not for him, there is no way Dinobot could have won. (Of course, if we got our shit together, we could have picked one G1 character and likely tipped the vote away from Dinobot. But, yeah, Willis organized his groups of fans.)
Yeah, he may have had a lot of influence on that one, but then there's this: There were four different G1 guys in that list, one BW dude. So the G1 guys, they all vote for their favorite character. And the BW guys, they all vote for Dinobot. And BW Dinobot, thanks to Bob, Larry, and Scott McNeil, was a pretty rad character. So I mean, there were other factors going for Dinobot other than Willis there. As for the "I take full credit", that was douchey and obnoxious, but I'm pretty sure dude was drunk when he typed that out. Lord knows I can't throw stones at someone for saying something dumb when they're drunk.
Just so it doesn't seem like I'm totally in dude's camp, the whole "creating" SG Ravage. So, take a character that was already designed and given personality, apply reverse-logic to it, pattern his speech off an internet meme, then use a differently-colored version of that character to represent this "new" character? Yeah, that's a feat of brilliance right up there with Stan n' Jack, is what that is. And the look of SG Ravage isn't even original, is it? It's based on a previous repaint of the Ravage mold? So what creative force went into that? Shit, SG Tentakil is represented by that weird yellow version of the Tentakil toy. He seems aloof and grumpy, but really, he wants friends and hugs. Lots of hugs! Look, guys, I'm a character creator! Okay, done with that.
Shockwave wrote:
And back on topic of problems with the comics, since this seems to also be looking back to past issues, I wanna comment on the character models in the -ation build up books. It seemed at first like they were going for an Alternators style aesthetic, but they were neither using those models nor the Classics ones which were just seeing release at the time. The fact that they were using new different models when they clearly had two separate toy lines they could have drawn from really annoyed me. I think that's why I liked AHM so much it's when they started using MP/Classics models.
Yeah, but at the time, Alternators didn't have that many characters to go with, and like you said, Classics was just getting started. May not have even started at all at that point, actually. So while they'd have been set if they wanted to use Jazz, Prowl, and Grimlock, guys like Ratchet and Bumblebee would have been shit outta luck. And Megatron. And we'd have been stuck with that kind of crappy Prime design. I think kind of winging it and going with what they did made sense at the time, especially since Classics wasn't supposed to be a recurring thing then. I do like how they've, like you said, made more use of the toy designs. And I love things like Universe Prowl being designed to look like IDW Prowl. Then you've got things like Kup and Scourge showing up on the toy shelves at the same time they're featured in the comics (I know Kup's been in a lot of comics before this, but dang), and I dig that, too. I like what Costa's doing and where his head's at, but I feel like if the comic was more tied to the toyline, it could only help both parts of the franchise.
Sydew wrote:
On the character models I really don't mind different models from the figures on the comics. Though I find it exciting when I see a model I have as a toy.
Yes. It makes it seem like a more legit version of the character in the comics when it actually looks like the toy, doesn't it? I mean, I'm used to the characters looking different from the show back in the G1 days, but now that they can make toys that can look so much like the old animation models or new comics, it seems like it'd be a whole lot cooler to bring the two together more. Get TFs back to being a toy book! There's no shame in that at all!